Annuity123 is dedicated to providing Americans with unbiased information about retirement, answering the tough questions you want to know.

With hundreds of articles on every retirement planning topic you can think of, peace of mind is just a click away.

How Annuities Can Solve Today’s Retirement Income Catch-22

Rob Brinkman

Joseph Heller wrote his American Classic ‘Catch-22’ in 1961 and the book title has become the catch phrase for a a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules. There are Catch-22’s in the investment world, particularly when it comes to retirement income.

In this video, Rob Brinkman, explores the Catch-22 as it relates to the 4% Withdrawal axiom in our current environment where the 10-Treasury is trading well below that. In a case study he demonstrates a Bucket Strategy, using a combination of Immediate Annuities and Deferred Annuities to accomplish the income goals of a 70-year old retired couple.

The dilemma today is that why you are working in your big earning years (40’s, 50’s, and 60’s) and accumulating savings and retirement accounts, many never think ahead to what interest rates will look like when you actually retire. For instance, the 4% withdrawal rule worked so well for so many years because you simply part much of your retirement savings into a safe treasury bond or even a CD (many years ago) that would easily guarantee 4% or more.

However, in today’s low interest rate environment, the 4% rule has imploded as it is impossible to find a short term guaranteed rate of 4% or more.

To watch, just click on the video picture below (you can make it full screen by clicking on the button on the bottom right corner).

To learn more from this professional, click here (Rob Brinkman).

About the Author:

Rob Brinkman began his investment career in 1987, one month after the infamous October stock market crash.  “In the wake of that kind of financial devastation, one learns the importance of a conservative approach to money management”, Rob was quoted in the local Texas newspaper that next week.

Over the past 26 years Rob has become one of the industry’s most respected advocates for conservative, safe investing.  As an executive for one of the country’s largest investment/insurance firms, Rob designed and implemented annuity platforms for clients such as Merrill Lynch, Raymond James and UBS.  In his private practice, Rob works with individuals who are in or nearing retirement, assisting them in asset preservation and income generation.  His ‘white board’ educational videos have become the internet standard for both basic understanding of investment fundamentals, as well as advanced investment strategies.

A123 Pro Question Button

 

Annuity123 does not offer insurance, investment, or tax advice.  You should always seek the guidance of qualified and licensed professionals concerning your personal insurance, investment, or tax matters.  Annuity123 is simply a platform allowing retirement planning professionals to help educate the community on various retirement planning topics.  Annuity123 does not directly support or take responsibility for ensuring the accuracy of the content displayed in the articles themselves or any feedback that may get added in the Comments section from the community.

4 Comments

  • Michael H. Baker says:

    Rob, I'm curious what contract you used to guarantee a 5% rate of return on 5 year deferral? Am I doing that math correctly?

  • Rob Brinkman says:

    Hi Michael, I believe you misunderstood what I meant by 5×5. It means 5 years of deferral and then the bucket is annuitized over another 5 years. It was not meant to mean earning 5% for 5 years. I hope that helps.

  • Michael H. Baker says:

    Rob, I'm good with the 5×5 strategy. You have 207k growing to 263k during that deferral period, which represents a growth rate of approx 5%. I'm asking what product you used to guarantee that RoR or was it a hypothetical return?

    • Rob Brinkman says:

      It was an FIA with a blended strategy of A-P-P with a cap of 5.0% and M-P-P with a cap of 5.50%. The client was comfortable with slight equity volatility on the upside, as long as there was no downside. His current alternative was all traditional equity and debt, which has volatility movement both ways.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.